rel="canonical" href="https://www.selfstudyworld.com/" /> MOSFET With Zener Diode Protection Skip to main content

MOSFET With Zener Diode Protection

MOSFET With Zener Diode Protection 

The layer of silicon dioxide between the gate and the channel is very thin and is subject to puncture by static electricity. When working with MOSFETs, special handling precautions should be taken as follows:


1. MOS devices should have their leads shorted together for shipment and storage. Conductive foam is often used for this purpose.

2. Avoid unnecessary handling, and pick up the device by the device by the case, not the leads.

3. All test equipment and tools should be connected to earth ground.

4. Workers handling MOSFET devices should have grounding straps attached to their wrists.

5. Never remove or insert MOSFET devices with the power on.


Many MOSFET devices are now available with built-in more zener diode protection. Zener diodes are placed between the gate and the channel, as shown in Fig. 

The voltage rating of the more zener diode is below the voltage that would cause punctures to the silicon dioxide insulator. If the voltage between the gate and the channel exceeds the voltage rating of the more zener, the diode conducts.

thus protecting the MOSFET from damage. At normal operating voltages, more zener diodes have no effect on the operation of the MOSFET

 
MOSFET With Zener Diode Protection


When a power MOSFET fails, the challenge is to determine the root cause of failure and implement a containment plan. However, this is more easily said than done. 

The complexity of semiconductor technologies and the advanced techniques required to analyze them means that failed components must be handled with extreme care in order to retain all possible failure signatures. 

Unfortunately, the urgencies of the manufacturing environment often lead to short-cuts as a failed component is rushed back manufacturer for failure analysis. If this is not carefully done, vital failure signatures can be lost, which adds further difficulties to the already complex task of failure analysis.

The end result is further delays or loss of opportunities to correctly identify the root cause of failure. Typically, failures are reported as In-Circuit Tester (ICT), Functional Test, or Field Returns. 

The following steps help to ensure that the source of MOSFET failure will be identified while avoiding any further damage or loss of failure signatures


Follow ESD protection procedures throughout hand of the suspect MOSFET

1. Resistive Test


Use a low-voltage laboratory-grade digital multimeter such as Keithley or HP to measure the resistance between gate and source, gate and drain, and

drain and source. Do not use a portable DMM. The 9 v battery supply can easily increase the extent of the damage or even destroy the evidence. It can also lead to

conflicting findings with repetitive tests. Thus a MOSFET with damage only in the gate-source region and exhibiting low gate-to-source resistance on the first measurement

can later exhibit high resistance and healthy functionality. Ina The result will be no fault found on FA report.

2. De-soldering


After determining that the MOSFET has failed, the next step is to remove the suspect MOSFET from the PB board assembly. The objective here is to remove the part from the PC board assembly without causing any further physical damage and/or loss of evidence. 

The only uniform, controlled heating should be used for removal of the MOSFET from the PC board assembly. Using standard soldering stations. can easily subject the part to non-uniform heating by individually heating up each solder joint. 

This approach is more likely to alter the failure signature. Do not use standard soldering stations. An advanced soldering station like the Metcal APR5000 is needed to generate a de-soldering temperature profile that is close to the reflow profile for safe removal of the part.

Popular posts from this blog

Limitations of Terzaghi Theory

Limitations of Terzaghi Theory The value of the coefficient of consolidation has been assumed to be constant.  The distance d of the drainage path cannot be measured accurately in the field. The thickness of the deposit is generally variable, and an average value has to be estimated.  There is sometimes difficulty 1n locating the drainage face, sometimes thin previous seams that can act as good drainage face are missed in the boring operations. The equation is based on the assumption that the consolidation is one-dimensional. In the field, the consolidation is generally 3-dimensional. The lateral drainage may have a significant effect on the time rate of consolidation. The initial consolidation and secondary consolidation have been neglected. Sometimes these form an important part of the total consolidation. In actual practice, the pressure distribution may be far from linear or uniform. Read More Muller-Breslau principle

Price Guard Wire Method

Price Guard Wire Method Some form of  Price Guard Wire Method  is generally used to eliminate the errors caused by leakage currents over insulation. Fig. 3.14 illustrates the operation of This Method. In fig 3.14(a), a high resistance mounted on a piece of insulating material is measured by the ammeter voltmeter method. The micro-ammeter measures the sum of the current through the resistor (IR) and the current through the leakage path around the resistor. The measured value of resistance computed from the readings indicated on the voltmeter and the microammeter, will not be a true value but will be in error.   Figure 3.14 Application of  guard  circuit for measurement of high resistance In fig, 3.14 (b), the  guard  terminal has been added to the resistance terminal block. The  guard  terminal surrounds the resistance terminal entirely and is connected to the battery side of the micro-ammeter. The leakage current IL now

Streamer Theory of Breakdown in Gases

Streamer Theory of Breakdown in Gases According to the Townsend theory firstly, current growth occurs as a result of the ionization process only. But in practice, breakdown voltages were found to depend on the gas pressure and the geometry of the gap. Second chances time lags of the order of 10-5 s, but practically it was observed to occur at a very short time of 10-8 s. Also, the Townsend mechanism predicts a very diffused form of discharge, that actually discharges were found to be filamentary and irregular. Townsend's mechanism failed to explain all these observed phenomena and as a result, The Streamer theory was proposed. The theory predicts the development of a spark discharge directly from a single avalanche in which the space charge developed by the avalanche itself is said to transform the avalanche into a plasma steamer. In Fig 1.7, a single electron starting at the cathode by ionization builds up an avalanche that crosses the gap. The electrons in the a