Skip to main content

JEE Main Toppers list 2019

NTA directed JEE Main test in January and the outcomes are out now for the equivalent. As indicated by an official statement from the NTA, 15 applicants have scored 100 percentile in the JEE Main's first version held in January.


JEE Main Result 2019: Check toppers' list

  • Dhruv Arora- Madhya Pradesh
  • Raj Aryan Agarwal- Maharashtra
  • Adelly Sai Kiran- Telangana
  • Bojja Chetan Reddy- Andhra Pradesh
  • Sambit Behera- Rajasthan
  • Naman Gupta- Uttar Pradesh
  • Yindukuri Jayanth Phani Sai- Telangana
  • Vishwanath K- Telangana
  • Himanshu Gaurav Singh- Uttar Pradesh
  • Kevin Martin- Karnataka
  • Shubhankar Gambhir- Rajasthan
  • Battepati Karthikeya- Telangana
  • Ankit Kumar Mishra- Maharashtra
  • Jayesh Singla- Punjab
  • Gupta Kartikey Chandresh- Maharashtra

Ventures to download JEE Main 2019 outcomes:

  • Visit the official site, jeemain.nic.in
  • Tap on 'download results'
  • Enter the enlistment number, move the ,number and tap on submit
  • The outcomes will show up on the screen
  • Download and take a printout for sometime later


JEE Main scores

The JEE Main scores, which have been distributed online on its official site jeemain.nic.in and are standardized scores crosswise over multi-session papers and depend on the overall execution of every one of the individuals who showed up for the examination in one session, as per the NTA.

The NTA Score shows the level of competitors that have scored equivalent to or beneath (same or lower crude scores) that specific Percentile in that session.


JEE Main Result 2019: Total number of understudies

A complete number of 9, 29,198 hopefuls were enrolled for Paper 1 ( held for affirmations in B.E. also, B. Tech. in designing and innovative organizations the nation over and furthermore as a qualification for JEE Advanced) in this test.

Popular posts from this blog

Limitations of Terzaghi Theory

Limitations of Terzaghi Theory The value of the coefficient of consolidation has been assumed to be constant.  The distance d of the drainage path cannot be measured accurately in the field. The thickness of the deposit is generally variable, and an average value has to be estimated.  There is sometimes difficulty 1n locating the drainage face, and sometimes thin previous seams that can act as good drainage faces are missed in the boring operations. The equation is based on the assumption that the consolidation is one-dimensional. In the field, the consolidation is generally 3-dimensional. The lateral drainage may have a significant effect on the time rate of consolidation. The initial consolidation and secondary consolidation have been neglected. Sometimes these form an important part of the total consolidation. In actual practice, the pressure distribution may be far from linear or uniform.

Streamer Theory of Breakdown in Gases

Streamer Theory of Breakdown in Gases According to the Townsend theory firstly, current growth occurs as a result of the ionization process only. But in practice, breakdown voltages were found to depend on the gas pressure and the geometry of the gap. Second chances time lags of the order of 10-5 s, but practically it was observed to occur at a very short time of 10-8 s. Also, the Townsend mechanism predicts a very diffused form of discharge, that actually discharges were found to be filamentary and irregular. Townsend's mechanism failed to explain all these observed phenomena and as a result, The Streamer theory was proposed. The theory predicts the development of a spark discharge directly from a single avalanche in which the space charge developed by the avalanche itself is said to transform the avalanche into a plasma steamer. In Fig 1.7, a single electron starting at the cathode by ionization builds up an avalanche that crosses the gap. The electrons in the a

Price Guard Wire Method

Price Guard Wire Method Some form of  Price Guard Wire Method  is generally used to eliminate the errors caused by leakage currents over insulation. Fig. 3.14 illustrates the operation of This Method. In fig 3.14(a), a high resistance mounted on a piece of insulating material is measured by the ammeter voltmeter method. The micro-ammeter measures the sum of the current through the resistor (IR) and the current through the leakage path around the resistor. The measured value of resistance computed from the readings indicated on the voltmeter and the microammeter, will not be a true value but will be in error.   Figure 3.14 Application of  guard  circuit for measurement of high resistance In fig, 3.14 (b), the  guard  terminal has been added to the resistance terminal block. The  guard  terminal surrounds the resistance terminal entirely and is connected to the battery side of the micro-ammeter. The leakage current IL now